Anyway, an important principle discussed in both classes is the "critical juncture," or, roughly, a turning point. This also plays into the concept of "path dependence," where current options are limited by past decisions. Basically (and I mean VERY basically--a quick google search shows that this can be an extremely complicated topic), as it was explained in one of my classes, critical junctures are the point when big decisions are possible, and the rest of the time, you're limited by path dependence set in place by the critical junctures.
In simpler terms? The decisions you make now set you on a specific path, where some later
I see it like this: as college students, we're at a critical juncture, RIGHT NOW. (no pressure, right?). We have the ability to make relatively big decisions that set a whole particular path before us. That's not so scary though, because I don't think political science is completely translatable to peoples' lives on an individual level (despite this blog entry's attempts at that?)...as in, just because we're setting our paths, doesn't mean we're going to be entirely limited by it. I think path dependence works a little better with policies than with people, but it still applies.
I don't know if you necessarily have to call out just one critical juncture for all of college or this age period, but to choose one, I think mine is when I settled on my public health major and realized I'm not doctor-material. Choosing not to continue pre-med studies is rather path-dependent, at least in the short term. (Luckily, nowadays, there's post-bac programs for people who decide after graduating that they actually do want to go to med school, but that's not me. Just throwing it out there). Anyway, I set myself a new path when I had that critical juncture and made that decision, and now each successive decision relevant to my life goals (undefined though they may be) are putting me further along on that path--I hope. That is, if political science works. I think I believe in it.
I hope this doesn't get construed as alarming--it's not like you make one decision and you're stuck for life, as it can be with policies. I think that's the beauty of our generation; we have so many options and fallbacks and the ability to redo things, all at much later points than previous generations.
So now, here's your quiz to see if you've been paying attention. Here I am, having passed my critical juncture in which I chose to pursue law school, and am currently faced with the following path-dependent decision: spring internship in DC or LSAT course? I might need a few more weeks of policy classes to figure this one out. Or maybe just a few more days in the week next semester. I'm wondering what the politically feasible option would be in the long run...okay, I can't even think of any more ways to stretch this.
(By the way, I'm choosing the LSAT course, sadly).
Recent Comments